In another legal step in the ongoing battle between rooftop solar owners and utilities, the California Supreme Court ruled on August 7 that a challenge to the reduction in rooftop solar incentives determined by the California Public Utilities Commission should be revisited. Three groups (Center for Biological Diversity, The Protect Our Communities Foundation, and the Environmental Working Group) filed an appeal in January 2023 that was denied in January 2024. The Supreme Court’s decision requires the appeals court to revisit the appeal. More details and background can be found in this Los Angeles Times article.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has announced a revised version of the Western Joshua Tree Relocation Guidelines and Protocols. It has been developed to implement provision of the state's Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act and revised over the course of several years, with extensive and impassioned public comment at several Fish and Game Commission meetings. The Department reports that the August 2025 version of the guidelines includes these revisions:

• New determinations when relocation may be required
• Expanded minimization measures
• Addressing availability of relocation sites
• Minor clarifications and grammatical edits

 

Despite an extensive array of public comments mostly expressing concerns to the Twentynine Palms City Council about the OfLand Resort proposed for Indian Cove Area (this very large document may take a while to open) , the City Council accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation to change the zoning and approve the project with a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Local radio station Z107.7 provides a comprehensive overview of the City Council meeting, and an update on the resort developer's comments about moving forward.

MBCA's comment letter to the City of Twentynine Palms Planning Department about the 100-unit luxury resort project details points of conflict with the City's General Plan but also makes suggestions for change. MBCA encourages a reduction in the size of the project, and makes additional detailed points about project deficits and discrepancies on issues including "edge effects" on wildlife; the Mojave Desert Sentinel Landscape provisions; aesthetic and viewshed degradation; and light trespass.   

A housing project application was filed with San Bernardino County in late April to subdivide 4 different parcels in the Lucerne Valley area into hundreds of small parcels intended to establish thousands of housing units. The Rancho Lucerne Project was first filed and evaluated more than 30 years ago. In addition to focusing comment on the officially expired previous approvals that must be honored, MBCA's letter enumerates ten areas of concern that must be re-evaluated due to climate and development changes. Among those areas are water, wastewater, air quality, traffic on Highway 247, cultural consultation, and environmental justice.

 

As part of the Power in Nature Coalition, MBCA joined 19 other organizations to comment on California's Wildlife Conservation Board's 2025-2030 Strategic Plan. Among other recommendations were creating metrics that measure more deeply than just number of projects, taking stronger action on climate change, and more emphasis on partnerships.

California Senate Bill 607 was introduced in February and is intended to change some aspects of the California Environmental Quality Act in order to fast-track large-scale energy-related projects. MBCA’s letter to Senators McGuire and Caballero opposes the bill for its potential to permit "many harmful projects including pipelines, data centers and waste storage facilities (to) be built in communities without sufficient environmental review or public participation." (Note: the bill was “ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Wiener” on June 5.)